Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Interview: You have to be hard to be a princess


It takes me a moment to spot Shilpa Shetty. Although we are both standing in the same function room at one of those gilt and marble hotels, her outfit is so gaudy (leopard print, shoulder pads, heavy yellow jewels) that she is somehow camouflaged.

Then a tinkling sound rings through the air and I swivel around to see a beautiful head floating near some faux-Etruscan vases. “A-ha-ha-ha-ha,” goes the tinkle. It is Shetty, 31, and this grating sound is her laugh, which she trots out a lot. Before the hate mail pours in, let me underline that I’m not about to say that Jade Goody was right to racially taunt Shetty. Clearly not. It’s just that when you meet Britain’s Bollywood queen in person (sample anecdote: “I just got back from three days in India. Thankfully I had a friend with a private jet who said, ‘Yah, hop on’,”) you can understand why she wound up her housemates.

For one thing, Shetty is not your normal girl-next-door reality TV winner. She is aggressively glamorous in a way that perhaps only Joan Collins could understand. And it has to be said that as she takes a seat opposite me she really is beyond ravishing. Her hair is as glossy as a show pony’s, her hands smooth as butter, her eyes smoky. Safe to say our Shilpa is not a fan of the natural look. It’s heavy pan stick all the way to ensure that not even the finest line appears on her face. She drinks mineral water from the bottle like any other high maintenance women trying to keep their lipstick on and admits she spends two hours in the gym every day perfecting her — admittedly awesome — body.

Of course all this guff goes with the territory for a Bollywood “star” (I only say “star” because my Indian friends are forever telling me that Shetty is “total bloody C list” back home). But when coverage of the last series of Celebrity Big Brother, which Shetty won, moved from page 24 of the Daily Star to top of the hour on CNN International, you expect someone more, well, substantial.

“Oh, I’m not politically inclined at all,” she giggles. “I like movies, cooking. I love to dance.” Dance? “Yes. I was a terrible student and I’m so disconnected with what’s going on. Newspapers are so depressing,” she trills. “You don’t want to wake up to that.” Shetty’s mother believes differently. “She comes into my bedroom in the morning and reads out the headlines. She’s like, ‘You have to be aware, you cannot look dumb’. So if there’s a big event that happens — like 9/11 — she’ll be like, ‘I hope you’re aware this happened’. A-ha-ha-ha-ha.”

Right. Shetty is irritating, which is a big disappointment, because I loved her on Big Brother, even when she was being bossy and swishing around the house like an air stewardess-cum-minor royal. She performed a fantastic Miss World-style exit speech and gives wonderfully priggish quotes: “Come on guys, this is the country of Shakespeare and yet I was the only one speaking English in that house.”

If you didn’t catch CBB proper, surely you will have seen the news? Or prime minister’s question time where Tony Blair had to talk about her, or Gordon Brown’s message that a vote for Shetty was a vote for Britain during his leadership-building tour of the subcontinent, or the record 45,100 complaints to Ofcom, the broadcasting regulator, and effigies of Channel 4 executives that were burnt on the streets of Patna in India.

The issue? Racism. After some initial froideur between the usual CBB cast of no-hopers and has-beens, a series of fights broke out between Shetty and a trio of loud-mouthed British chavettes led by tabloid staple Goody. Some of it was unfairly represented (yes, they made fun of her accent, but she made fun of theirs too). Some of it was just awful. Footballer’s girlfriend Danielle Lloyd said she should “f*** off home”, Goody said, “She’s called Shilpa Pop-padom . . . Shilpa F***awallah”, while former pop star Jo O’Meara said, “No wonder they’re all so thin in India, they’re eating Shilpa’s undercooked chicken.”

All three were booted out of the Big Brother house and are now in various stages of “rehabilitation” (Goody chose the Priory, of course). Shilpa, on the other hand, triumphed and is on track to make £10m.

There are book deals, perfume launches, albums and a rumoured movie with Hugh Grant all in the pipeline. She’s also had one or two offers not normally extended to the winners of television game shows. She has been invited to parliament by Blair and Brown — “I was so humbled” (yuck). Next month she will have an audience with the Queen on Commonwealth Day. Meanwhile, Brits are falling over one another to embrace her and apologise to her in the street.

“They’re so shocked to see I’m okay,” she says. But those girls were horrible to you, and racist. “No,” she replies firmly. Shilpa, how can you say that? “I’ll tell you why. It came out of insecurity and jealousy. It’s a woman thing. It was silly.” She laughs again.

Baffled, I ask her to define what she would consider racist. “For me racism would mean not wanting to have anything to do with someone because of their colour.” What about just thinking less of someone because of it? “No, that’s not racism to me. There are a lot of people who won’t go into an Indian restaurant, who won’t associate with people who are black or brown.”

What, like white supremacists or Ku Klux Klan members? Surely racism exists in less extreme forms? “I guess there are different forms of racism,” she ponders, “but if I had to hold a grudge it would be more over something like [the latter].”

I’m astonished. Is she being dim or just coy? Recently she told an Indian journalist that “every nonwhite is a victim of racism”. What did she mean by it? “That’s the feed-back I got when I came out of the house. Somehow it touched a raw nerve in the Asian community. The UK happens to be a place that is pretty multicultural. You have people from all over the world settling here and you welcome them with open arms, but it seems a lot of those people have been put through some amount of discrimination.”

So Britain is racist? “Oh, no,” she gasps, desperate not to offend. “Most of them [Indians] have done very well for themselves and it’s because they’ve been encouraged by the people here. They wouldn’t have been able to make it otherwise. Look at Lakshmi Mittal, an Indian with the most expensive house in England.”

It’s a terrible example (Mittal brought his first billions with him to the UK in the mid1990s and no doubt had an easier ride than most). But Shetty can’t bring herself to complain. It’s not in her nature.

She comes from a land where you don’t discuss your sex life, where actors don’t kiss in films, a land of arranged marriages and where the masses adore her. In Shetty’s world, open criticism isn’t “honest”, it’s bad manners. Her politeness is so ingrained that it makes her unbearably slippery to the British sensibility. I keep wanting a straight answer which just never comes no matter how hard I push her; and I certainly try to the extent that her people tell me to stop.

Shetty was born in Tamil Nadu, southern India, to affluent middle-class parents from the super-conservative Bunt community. “At 17 I was the first Bunt girl in Bollywood,” she boasts, but as a result her grandmother didn’t speak to her for three years and her father was also upset. “To be an actress you have to expose yourself in what you wear. When you come from an orthodox society you don’t want your daughter doing that.

“But my parents are very supportive,” she continues mistily. “Truly they are the wind beneath my wings.” Shetty is given to this kind of beauty pageant speak. “There was a time when I was a teenager and I was doing dance, karate, cookery classes, basketball, volleyball. They encouraged me.”

Did they push you? “No,” she says, unconvincingly.

In truth Mrs Shetty sounds like a tough nut. A self-proclaimed clairvoyant, she has masterminded her daughter’s career since year dot and takes all the money decisions — firing the first publicists and hiring Max Clifford, for instance — even though Shetty is hardly a spring chicken these days. “All my financial affairs are handled by mum because, honestly, I can’t be bothered.”

Shetty denies rumours that her parents employed mobsters to extract funds from a film director who reneged on his contract and numerous stories circulating Bollywood about her saucy love life. “If I go out for dinner with a friend’s husband the press say we are dating. It’s ridiculous,” she huffs, flicking that astonishing mane. Foolish is the wife who lets her husband dine with Miss Shilpa, I say.

But despite her playful front Shetty still sleeps in the same small room in her parents’ penthouse that she had as a child. It’s covered in silks and filled with pictures of Ganesh, the Hindu god of success.

“Coming from that, for me, Big Brother was really new. I’d never even come across people speaking to me like that. I’ve been an actor for 14 years and been very pampered.”

Should Channel 4 have broadcast the inci-dents? “Of course,” she cries. “At least it had a message.” Her support for the channel isn’t that surprising given she was paid about £300,000 to participate (reportedly the highest of all the “celebrity” housemates).

“But I don’t want it to be bad for those girls,” she says of Goody and co. “It’s enough punishment already.”

She laughs again, happy to smooth everything over. It’s what she was brought up to do. In one final attempt to crack the front, I say that while she may not be able to see it, those girls looked pretty racist from the outside. “Yes,” she says softly. Perhaps observers are better able to voice that opinion than you are? “Yes, yes,” she says, nodding. Then she starts another empty Miss World speech about tolerance. It sounds so unheartfelt that I’m not even sure that she really cares about racism. She only gets animated when she talks about the possibility of appearing in a movie with Grant.

The Times of India said Britain’s love affair with Shetty is “the epitome of the silliness of our times”. It is that, but our obsession with her stems from the deep-seated fear of difference, the fear that there is perhaps in all of us a touch of the Goody. We have made Shetty the pin-up girl for our collective paranoia about racism. We want her to be part of our multicultural melting pot, to be just like the rest of us. But here’s the truth. She’s not.

giles@sunday-times.co.uk

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Celina Jaitley had to take a tetanus injection for a kiss


In forthcoming film 'Red', a sequence demanded Aftab Shivdasani to push Celina Jaitley against the wall and then forcibly kiss her. What happen next listen from Celina, she informs, "After the shot, I actually had a cut on upper lip. In to time it swelled up. The entire unit made fun of me." Even she had to take a tetanus injection for afterwards infected gash. Aftab was very embarrassed after the incident. A unit member laughs, "We used to rag him by asking him to get a check-up done in case he was suffering from rabies."

Shah Rukh Khan: It wasn't Salman's idea


On a TV show Shah Rukh Khan gave away a very expensive watch of his to a contestant. Everybody said it was Salman's idea. But SRK clarifies, "No, its not true that Salman asked me to give it, though I must admit that I was inspired by him and Sanju who are always giving away expensive watches to their friends and fans. I felt very bad for this guy who lost on my show; I just wanted to make him happy. And it felt good doing that."

Upen Patel is not that much innocent as he looks


Upen Patel is not that much innocent as he looks. He is quite a prankster on the sets. And his co-star Celina Jaitley immediately admits it. She shares, "I have to thanks my co-actors of 'Shakalaka Boom Boom' - Bobby Deol and Upen Patel - for all the pranks they played on me, especially Mr. Patel. That's what made this film a fun experience

Anwar



Director: Manish Jha
Music: Mithoon, Pankaj Awasthi
Cast: Manisha Koirala, Siddharth Koirala, Rajpal Yadav, Vijay Raaz, Yashpal Sharma, Hiten Tejwani, Nauheed Cyrusi, Sudhir Pandey, Pankaj Jha, Sanjay Mishra, Rushali, Prithvi Zutshi, Lalit Tiwari

Namastey London



Director: Vipul Amrutlal Shah
Music: Himesh Reshammiya
Cast: Akshay Kumar, Katrina Kaif, Upen Patel, Rishi Kapoor, Javed Sheikh

Undertrial



Director: Aziz Khan
Music: Anu Malik, Shamir Tandon
Cast: Rajpal Yadav, Monica Castellino, Prem Chopra, Kader Khan, Pratima Kazmi, Rajesh Puri, Mukesh Tiwari, T. K. Choudhary, Suneel Rege

Monday, February 26, 2007

Queen of Hearts


The most beautiful women on earth, Aishwarya Rai. Ash won Miss India (runner-up) & Miss world title in 1994.Her superhit movies are Taal, Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam, Hamara Dil Aap Ke Paas Hai.



Aishwarya Rai

Add : 402 Ramlaxmi Niwas, 16th Road (Near Khar Gym), Mumbai 400054, INDIA

DOB : November 1, 1973

Place of Birth : Karnataka, India

Star : Scorpio

Height : 5 ' 7 "

Eyes : Green

Family : Mother Brindya, Brother Aditya

Nick Name : Aishu

Languages : English, Hindi, Kannada, Tamil

Madhuri Dixit




Address: Vijaydeep, 3rd Floor, Iris Park, Juhu, Bombay 400049, India

Date of Birth: May 15th, 67

Place of Birth: Bombay/Mumbai

Status : Married

Husband's Name : SriRam Nene, a surgeon from L.A (U.S.A)

Famous For : My smile & acting

Nick Name : Bubly

Languages : English, Hindi, Marathi

Is it the complete 'truth'?

Black Friday is a very well made movie; the technical aspects are par excellence and live up to the expectations of the genre. The acting is at its best, the background music is very well used, and the locations and sets seem as real as they could be. But the narration style is not gripping at all.
This movie is being advertised as a movie about 'the truth'. So there's the usual gore, the regular torture in prison cells, the typical yelling and pleading associated with a crime, and the investigation thereof. The strange thing is that not a single cop was bribed during the inquiry and you don't see one politician through the movie. Was it really so easy for the police to get all the information about this act of terrorism as is portrayed in the movie? And by the way, if this movie is 'the truth', all our other movies that show greedy police officers and politicians and claim to be fictitious, etc - they are actually telling the truth! These dishonest people in the bureaucracy are a figment of imagination!

The movie is not about one police officer, one terrorist or one victim. It is about the bomb blasts. It is a dispassionate, non-judgmental account. It is like reading a newspaper, gives you the details of the way things supposedly happened. Of course, the visuals and language are much more graphic than a few pictures in print.

Kay Kay Menon (Additional Police Commissioner), Pawan Malhotra (Tiger Menon) and Aditya Shrivastav (Badshah) do full justice to their roles. But the characters (except Badshah) are not sketched out very well and the non-linear presentation does not help. In fact it adds to the confusion of the long list of names and the inter-connections.

Also, what exactly is the aim here? Is it to tell the world, "this is how ammunition is smuggled into India, this is how terrorists were trained, and this is how it was planted"? There is nothing shocking about the answers to any of these questions. Obviously, if there were bomb blasts, someone-somewhere got the raw material and organized the whole operation. Is the aim, then, to tell both the Hindu and Muslim fascists how this is not what God wants? If it was so easy to convince the fundamentalists, then wouldn't half the problems in the world be over by now? And I surely hope the aim is not to tell Tiger Menon and Dawood Ibrahim, "We know what you did thirteen years ago?" By the way, in the middle of all this, was I supposed to feel bad for the terrorist?

No, I certainly don't expect every movie to have a list of aims and objectives. But, for a serious movie of this caliber, a much clearer purpose is needed. Especially when the previews have bold, red letters on a black background that read "the 'real' contender for the Oscars", a little more than a documentary is expected. Unless, of course, you are hoping for a nomination in the "documentary" category

Saturday, February 24, 2007

BOLLYWOOD NEWS


Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan have finally become engaged, setting the stage for one of the most glamorous Indian weddings in a decade

India’s hottest Bollywood couple, Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan, have finally become engaged, setting the stage for one of the most glamorous Indian weddings in a decade.

The son of the screen legend Amitabh Bachchan proposed to the former Miss World in New York on Friday and exchanged rings with her at a private ceremony in Bombay last night.

“The children have decided. We are very happy and thought we should go ahead with the engagement ceremony,” Amitabh Bachchan told The Times of India.

The wedding — to be held at a hotel in Bombay in February or March — is being hailed as a Bollywood fairytale come true and as India’s answer to the coupling of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. But in a distinctly Indian twist, it is said to have been complicated by Ms Rai’s inauspicious horoscope.

Hindu families traditionally examine a prospective couple’s horoscopes to check for marital compatibility — even among the Westernised urban elite. Ms Rai is widely reported to be manglik, meaning she was born under a poorly placed Mars that can bring bad luck and even premature death to her husband.

Before getting married, manglik women are traditionally required to go through a symbolic wedding to an idol of the Hindu god Vishnu or to a peepal or banana tree. It is still unclear if Ms Rai has been through such a ritual.

But the couple and their families have been spotted visiting Hindu temples, astrologers and priests in recent months, prompting a frenzy of speculation in the Indian media.

Rumours of the relationship between Ms Rai, 33, and Mr Bachchan, 31, emerged in February last year when his uncle, Ajitabh, met an astrologer to discuss the match.

The couple repeatedly denied that they were anything more than close friends.

But they were then seen visiting a Hindu temple with their parents in November and emerging with marigold garlands around their necks — usually a sign of engagement.

Indian media also reported that their families had offered prayers on the banks of the River Ganges at the holy city of Varanasi to help to clear up potential conflicts in their horoscopes.

Ms Rai’s previous relationships with the Bollywood actors Salman Khan and Vivek Oberoi are widely reported to have ended badly.

Mr Bachchan was previously engaged to Karisma Kapoor, a former leading Bollywood actress, in a high-profile ceremony on his father’s birthday, but they broke up before marrying.

Sunday’s engagement ceremony came two days after the launch of Guru, the latest in a string of films co-starring Ms Rai and Mr Bachchan.

Mr Bachchan placed a diamond ring on Ms Rai’s finger in front of a small crowd of friends and relatives at his beachfront home in the exclusive Juhu district of Bombay.

As news of the engagement spread, hundreds of fans sang and danced through the night outside the house and several actors, industrialists and politicians visited the couple to offer congratulations.

The green-eyed Ms Rai is considered Bollywood’s top leading lady with several hit movies to her credit, including Bride and Prejudice, an adaptation of Jane Austen’s novel Pride and Prejudice. She featured on the cover of Time magazine in 2003, was named one of People magazine’s 100 most beautiful people.

But the future of her acting career is in question as most Bollywood actresses stop work after marriage, only returning to the screen to play older women. Mr Bachchan is less well known internationally, but has starred in several successful films and was voted the sexiest Asian man by a British newspaper last year.

HOTBOLLYWOOD BOY


Never underestimate the one who prefers to keep silence. Salman Khan, the man who never uttered a word during the months of unending controversies, is still reluctant to speak out his heart. The simple reason, he gives, is that clarifying one issue would only lead to some fresh controversy. Tere Naam is on the verge of release and that's probably the only release why he is little bit forthcoming to say something. And while he speaks, slowly, in soft voice and sober manner, you are bound to pay absolute attention to every word he says. And as the conversation moves on, Salman not only divulge details about the reel-life records, but he also let's you know facts about mostly all those issues that were used to tarnish his image.
Here is Salman unplugged for you...

Tell us about Tere Naam...
Tere Naam has a very beautiful concept. Still its narrative is about
losing everything. Though I never seen its original version before
signing the film, I heard the story in nutshell and liked it very
much. The film has action but they are strongly linked with emotions.
The whole film is good. Lots of people (in love) get involved in a
situation like this. But it's a film and one should not take it other
way.

What's your character in the film?
I am playing Radhey in the film. He is an ex-student of a college who
always stands by for justice. He falls in love with somebody who
hates him. It's not a negative character and the villain in the film
is coincidences.

Some people have started saying that it's a true story of you. Maybe
because the catch line, 'unfortunately a true love story' is used.
It's all bullshit. Tere Naam is earlier made in three different
languages. It's not close to my life. Those whose English is poor and
don't interpret it well have extracting whatever meaning they want
from the film's catch line. Tere Naam is a tragic film which revolves
around true love. That's it.

You have donned different getups for this film.
Yeah...because the character I play is a local hero of a small town.
Portraying it well needed a different look. And then, Radhey passes
through various situations and a drastic change was required for the
narrative. That's why I have different getups.

Past few months had been troublesome for you. Why you never bothered
to clarify your side?
What should have I said? I am asked (by my producers) to talk and
that's why I am speaking to you. Otherwise, I don't like to speak out
like this. And I felt silence is the best thing.

What is your take on the Vivek Oberoi issue...he called a press
conference and said a lot about you...
(Laughs)...(waits)...I could not stop my life that time. And you know
that he is a good boxer...(smiles)...that's why I kept mum.

You went to London the same night of the press conference.
Yeah...(smiles)...actually, I ran away from India. But I want to tell
you to ask him to produce mobile bills, if he is right in claiming
that I had called up several times to him. And then, I will produce
my mobile bill, which I certainly have with me.

Will you do a film with him, after whatever has happened?
The problem is with him and not mine. He is a little kid. I wonder
how he must be bearing himself all the time...but I don't mind
working with him.

And what you would say about Aishwarya Rai episode?
(Pauses)...man, no one will sit and write poems when she feels
angry...I think she must be hurt...something must have hurt her and
so...

The media took a tough stance against you when the accident happened
and during every problem which came in your life.
There are few people whose ego is hurt when I decline to speak to
them. But then I don't like to clarify. What's the use of issuing
clarifications every now and then? I will speak once and the same
words will do damage in some fresh manner. Leave it, friend. Some
people say that Salman beats up anyone and everyone but you tell me,
how many times I have done it? Except for Subhash Ghai, I have not
beaten up anyone. And in that case, I had to beat him because things
went up to that level and I could not control myself.

But all those happenings have tarnished your image.
I don't understand how people can make judgment on others without
knowing facts. They judge a person the way they want just because
they don't have access to him. You must be bad sometime, but not as
bad as the media portrays you. That's very bad...very bad.

What would you like say about the accident?
That was tragic but few things are bound to happen in life. And this
happens with so many others but I being a star, things were stretch
too far. One has to pay price when such accident happen and you have
to pass through (legal) formalities. Mumbai only records 5-6
accidents like this every day. My driver kept saying that, "It was me
who was driving the vehicle and not my Baba (Salman)" but no one
listened to him. And when some say that I should be treated like a
layman by the law, I say that a layman has no access to the media. I
also kept away from giving any clarifications. Yet, when I was freed
after paying Rs. 900 bail, they started crying again. Why?

Are you emotional?
I am not emotional...I am fool. Emotional reactions are not backed by
logic. What I have learnt is that you should not react to every
issue.

Recently you said that you want to change yourself and then the
country.
(Smiles)...Sometime such comedies happen inadvertently. And there is
nothing I need to change in myself. I don't know whether I would be
able to change the country but yes, I want to do something good for
Bandra, the suburb where I live. I think you must do something for
your family, your friends and for at least one neighbor. That's more
than enough. And for my locality, I wish to do some things that can
ease the life of people and give me true satisfaction.

What good you have done for the family whose member died in that
accident?
I have deposited a big money to the court for the family. That sum is
very big and can make life of that family better. And once the case
is over, I will do my best for the deceased's son, be it education or
giving him a job in my home production.

What's happening in the home production front?
We have two movies on the cards. One is Lucky in which I will be
playing the lead and the other will have Sohail. Mithunda
(Chakraborty) is playing an important role in Lucky. Moreover, we
have plans to make Ramayan also. And we may start a movie staring
three of us (Salman, Sohail and Arbaaz) together but nothing is
decided as yet.

Which other films you have after Tere Naam?
Dil Churake Chal Diye and Bagbaan will hit theatres after this film.
I am doing a guest appearance in Bagbaan. Merigold is slated to go on
the floors in November, which maybe postponed to January next year
also. I am shooting for Sanghaar now and Bajirao Mastani will be
started in March next year.

What about Pritish Nandy Communication's Sahib Biwi Aur Ghulam?
I am committed to do a film with PNC but I am yet to know whether it
is Sahib Biwi Aur Ghulam or some other film.

And finally, can we say that your career will get a new start with
Tere Naam?
No, because I was there, I am here and I will be very much there in
future. To those who think otherwise, I want to say that they never
made me or they can't even break me. The moment I will feel I am
through, I will give up myself.



;

Want to leave your worries behind, get on board HONYMOON TRAVELS PVT. LTD.





Starring : Reema Kagti
Vishal Dadlani, Shekhar Ravjiani
Abhay Deol, Minissha Lamba, Shabana Azmi, Boman Irani, Kay Kay Menon, Raima Sen, Amisha Patel, Karan Khanna, Sandhya Mridul, Vikram Chatwal, Ranvir Shorey, Dia Mirza, Arjun Rampal, Suzanne Bernert, Naseruddin Shah

The movie is about six married couples on a package honeymoon to Goa. Each couple is given their fare share of time for the audience to understand their love story and the best part is that the film clocks exactly 120 minutes. Kudos to the director for leaving no loopholes as far as groping for identification of characters is concerned. Just a month ago SALAAM-E-ISHQ was released, again portraying six couples and inspite of the film clocking a good three-and-a-half hours most characters were sketchy at best. Sohail Khan and Ishaa Koppikar will vouch for that
The film opens with Dia Mirza (Shilpa) crying as she boards the bus. Ranvir Sheorey (Hitesh) her husband assures her parents that she will return with a smile on her face. Mid-way there’s a twist in their love story…

Kay Kay Menon (Partho Sen) stays in character as the protective husband of Raima Sen (Milly Sen). Both the actors essay the story of their life with a Bengali flavour. There is one flaw though here; the makers could have done well to give English translations of their Bengali dialogues. Partho adapts well to his wife’s need for letting her hair down. At last, after a long time, Raima has some meat in her role and she digs in her teeth with glee. Kay Kay is adorable when he lets his hair down on the dance floor. The switch from conservative to ‘to-hell-with-you’ is amazing. That’s what good actors are all about.

Amisha Patel (Pinky) and Karan Khanna (Vicky) have a good match going but there is something bothering her husband. Amisha, as the wife who loves to talk too much does manage to get on your nerves. Which goes to show that she is playing her part.

Sandhya Mridul (Madhu) takes off from where she left off in Madhur Bhandarkar’s PAGE 3. This bindaas babe who has her heart broken ends up surfing the net for the wrong catch in Vikram Chatwal (Bunty). However, they both agree to stay in the marriage as it’s convenient for them.

Abhay Deol (Aspi) is surprisingly likeable in his Parsi act while his wife Minissha Lamba (Zara) compliments him in every aspect. Their salsa performance to the song Pyaar Ki Yeh Kahani is outstanding. Even as the other couples applaud their dance, you as audience begin your clap of approval. The best part is that they as a couple don’t fight which is the envy of others. Why…. Go find out.

Finally you have Boman Irani (Oscar Fernandez) and Shabhana Azmi (Nahid). Theirs is a complete love story. Boman is hilarious in his portrayal of a katlic (read Catholic). His lingo is rib-tickling. As a distraught father who chances upon his daughter having a field day in Goa with her bunch of friends, Boman is very vulnerable. But the funniest is when he tells his guide in exasperation who keeps pulling his legs saying “there, there, there” pointing to non-existent Dolphins, “Arre Dolphin nahi to ek pomfret to dikhao!”

Want to leave your worries behind, get on board HONYMOON TRAVELS PVT. LTD.

Ratings: 3/5

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Finally it's time for the world to witness the high voltage sensual drama that Ram Gopal Verma has made possible with Nishabd. For around a year there have been newsbytes in dozens about how RGV planned to aesthetically portray the love story of a 60 year old man [Amitabh Bachchan] and a 18 year old girl [Jiah Khan]. Now it should be a matter of weeks before one sees the events unfolding on the big screen. But before that the two lead actors sing a song apiece in this unique album that has just two tracks - 'Rozana' and 'Take Lite'.
Brilliant. That's the word which is apt to describe the feel of 'Rozana', a song taken to great heights due to 4 men involved with it. They are composer Vishal Bhardwaj, singer Amitabh Bachchan, lyricist Munna Dhiman and last but not the least film maker Ram Gopal Verma who dares yet again to give a go-ahead to a song like this that breaks the norm.

Beginning in a manner where Big B is almost inaudible for almost half a minute, 'Rozana' takes multiple routes throughout its duration. From being extremely low key to taking medium notes and then escalating to an all time high - the song has Vishal Bhardwaj stamp all over it. A love ballad about a man deeply in love with a woman, it could as well be called the best ever by Bachchan as a singer. In fact it won't be wrong to say that is there is a song that can be counted in the same league as 'Neela Aasmaan So Gaya' [Silsila], it is 'Rozana'. A must hear!

"This one has a potential to be one eye pleasing number" - this is what ends up exclaiming on the very first hearing of 'Take Lite'. Powered by some heavy orchestra and an overall western theme, 'Take Lite' has some thumping feel to it that you witness time and again in downtown discotheque tracks. A Hinglish number by Farhad Sajid that is a mix of Western, Turkish, Middle East and our own Bollywood flavor to it, this Amar Mohile composition should rock on screen if RGV goes all out on glamour quotient with some fast paced editing and camera cuts taking care of the rest.

And now let's talk about Jiah Khan who has sung 'Take Lite'. If one has to pick and choose some of the better actors who have come behind the mike to croon a number, Jiah would certainly be a front runner. In fact it is difficult to ascertain if she is an actor who has turned to singing or is it other way around! She surprises with the hold that she has behind her voice and gives a good account of a female who knows her strengths as singer!

Even though there are just two tracks in the album, Nishabd makes a worthy hear. Both 'Rozana' and 'Take Lite' are extremely worthy hears and actually end up defining the character graphs of the two lead protagonists in the film. The numbers are bound to go down very well with the narrative and if RGV too has put his heart and soul in this project just as his music team has, Nishabd as a film could well turn out to be a surprise success of the season!

HE IS 60 SHE IS 18


The high voltage sensual drama that Ram Gopal Verma has made possible with Nishabd.

The story is about a love of 60 years man with 18 years foreign return girl who is a friend of the daughter that very old man.

But before that the two lead actors sing a song apiece in this unique album that has just two tracks - 'Rozana' and 'Take Lite'.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Bollywood off to a headstart in 2007

Guru, Salaam-e-Ishq success raises hopes of a repeat of 2006 dream run

While 2006 ended with a big bash for the Hindi film industry with movies raking in the moolah both at home and overseas, 2007 promises to propel the growth further. The first month of the year has paved a decent path for Bollywood's journey for the rest of the year.

Although the year started with the drab Kudiyon Ka Hai Zamaana and got the audiences’ disapproval, Mani Ratnam's Guru garnered public appreciation and boxoffice revenues. The total collection for the movie in India till now is Rs 24.6 crore, while the collections overseas was more than Rs 10 crore in the first ten days. Parzania, with Sarika and Naseeruddin Shah in the lead role, caters to a niche audience and has been gaining critical acclaim from that domain.

The only other exception was Salaam-e-Ishq. "The film's collection dropped sharply after the first day itself," says Taran Adarsh, a trade analyst. The first week collection for the multi-starrer is Rs 8.2 crore. Overseas, the collection for the film fell by 72% in the UK after collecting Rs 2.54 crore for the opening weekend.

The brilliant show put up by Bollywood in 2006 has raised expectations for this year. "The year looks promising with the line up of good movies," says Adarsh. The year has movies ranging across period dramas like Eklavya and Jodha Akbar and sports-based movies like Goal and Hattrick. The biggies include Yash Raj Films' Tara Rum Pum, Chak de India and Sanjay Leela Bhansali's Saawariya. The sequel of animated movie Hanuman is also slated for release. Movies that are expected to be a feast for multiplex goers include Provoked, Black Friday and The Namesake. Some of the anticipated and controversial movies like Deepa Mehta's Water and RGV Ke Sholay will also be released this year.

Says media analyst Sanjeev Hota, "The year looks good but it's difficult to predict anything for Bollywood. This year would not be as spectacular as 2006. But the overseas market is growing and the growth prospects are highly positive."

With films like Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna getting as much as Rs 32 crore from the overseas market and Dhoom:2 still running for the tenth week with a total collection of Rs. 40.23 crore in India, the year 2006 has been dazzling for Bollywood. Lage Raho Munnabhai had the nation talking about Gandhism, Rang de Basanti set the youth's pulse racing, Fanaa marked the comeback of Kajol and Omkara, based on Shakespeare's Othello, was a brilliant piece of art according to critics. Action and special effects ruled the roost with Krrish and Dhoom:2.

Reliance to sell DVD players for Rs. 450

In a move that is sure to set off a price war in the segment, Mukesh Ambani led Reliance Retail plans to sell DVD players at $10-$12 in India.

At the current rate, that's a jaw-dropping price tag of Rs 450-Rs 540, which tradesmen term dirt cheap. Reliance is expected to source these low-cost DVD players from China where it is in the process of setting up a sourcing office, with an employee strength of 80.

"China is where most of our in house labels, especially in the consumer durable segment, are going to be sourced from," a senior official at Reliance Retail told the press.

However, these low-cost DVD players will not come with the de rigeur after sale services which the Company has been very actively claiming for its consumer electronics. Instead, they will belong to the use-and-throw category.

Currently, the 2.5 million units DVD player market is dominated by LG, Phillips, Samsung and Onida. Over 70% of the market is in the organised segment. The unbranded, low cost DVD players imported from China retail on the street for as low as Rs 1,500 - Rs 1,800 and are particularly popular among cable operators. Retailers in China are known to command hefty margins owing to the bulk purchases made by them and are often seen to bully their suppliers. Given the VAT rate in the country, a Company manufacturing on a large scale should be able to sell a DVD player for around $20 in India. "However, a Company may sell it for even lower than $20, which isn't a profitable proposition but could be done to attract customers into buying a basket of products which is overall profitable to the firm", an industry expert commented.

Reliance Retail is expected to begin rolling out its consumer electronics stores by June. The Company is also opening its first hypermarket in Ahmedabad in April. "The hypermarket will be spread over 1.70 lakh square feet and will sell everything except for a yatch", another Reliance Retail official told the press.

According to industry experts, The Bharti-Wal-Mart announcement has definitely made Reliance even more aggressive in competitive pricing, as Wal-Mart is known world over for opening price points, and in the price sensitive Indian market, the high price elasticity of demand across such product ranges could well decide the market shares and long run profit margins of retail giants.
Source: ScreenIndia

'Eklavya' is Amitabh's career best: Vidhu Vinod Chopra


Mumbai, After pursuing Amitabh Bachchan for almost two decades, Vidhu Vinod Chopra finally succeeded in getting the ace actor in "Eklavya" and says it's a kind of performance that people have "never seen before".

"We've been trying to work together since 1987. Words fail to convey how I felt after working with him," Chopra told IANS.

"Ralph Fiennes saw 'Eklavya' with me. He was so moved. At the end of it, he applauded spontaneously. On an impulse he went with me to Amitabh Bachchan's house.

"Here was one of the greatest actors in the world praising Amitabh and telling him his performance in 'Eklavya' was among the best he has seen. For once, I think Amitabh took me seriously. I also keep telling him 'Eklavya' is his career's best," he added.

Amitabh will be seen in another film of Chopra, which is going to be directed by Ram Madhvani who worked with him in "Mission Kashmir".

"Ram is making a huge fantasy like 'Lord Of The Rings' for me. Amitabh will star in that. And if all goes well I'll direct another film this fall. I've a couple of ideas."

Excerpts:

Q: Recently you had a very special guest to watch your new film with you.

A: Yes, Ralph Fiennes was here for his UNICEF work. It was a private visit. He saw my "Eklavya" with me. There was just the two of us. He was so moved. At the end of it, he applauded spontaneously. On an impulse he went with me to Amitabh's house.

For once, Amitabh seemed completely moved by the compliments. Here was one of the greatest actors in the world praising Amitabh and telling him his performance in "Eklavya" was among the best he has seen. For once, I think Amitabh took me seriously. I keep telling him "Eklavya" is his career's best.

Q: Your coming together with Amitabh for a film has been delayed by many years.

A: We've been trying to work together since 1987. Words fail to convey how I felt after working with him. Imagine an actor of Amitabh's calibre going on location seven days in advance to rehearse. When I made the request, I thought he'd think I'm crazy. I can tell you one thing, you've never seen the Amitabh of "Eklavya" before. Considering he's been around for 35 years that's saying a lot.

Q: He was very uncomfortable with the beard he had to wear for your film.

A: Yes, but that's what makes him a great actor. You know, all of us have to bear with a lot to create what we believe in. Striving for excellence is never a comfortable position to be in.

Q: Saif Ali Khan had grown quite a lot as an actor in "Parineeta". Has he reached another level with "Eklavya"?

A: Oh absolutely. I also think he was outstanding in "Omkara" too.

Q: "Eklavya" is your first directorial venture in seven years...

A: That's right. My first since "Mission Kashmir" seven years ago. But it doesn't seem I've been away. I was busy with "Munnabhai". I could've delayed it for my directorial film. But to me there's difference between what I direct and what I produce. Really, I felt no lacuna.

As long as I was making good cinema I'm happy. I like to give one film all I have. And I gave "Munnabhai" all I had. "Eklavya" took almost five years to write. When Fiennes said "Eklavya" was Shakespearean I was very touched. I put him on to Abhijat Joshi who wrote the film.

Q: Jaya Bachchan says she can't slot "Eklavya"?

A: Neither can I. I can only define it as an endeavour for the entire team to strive for excellence. At the risk of sounding immodest, I'd like to say most people haven't seen anything like this.

Q: Are you happy with the brand name called "Munnabhai"?

A: We recently shot a trailer for the third. It's called "Munnabhai Chale Amrika". Fieness and I went by helicopter to Nitin Desai's studio in Karjat (outskirts of Mumbai) and shot the trailer. I'm proud of what we're doing. And I'm happy that our cinema has gone where it deserved to be.

But when I make a film, I don't think of how far it'd go. To me what matters is how far I'll go. I think I've gone quite a way. I'm totally satisfied with my work in "Eklavya".

Q: Any regrets about your talented protégés like Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Pradeep Sarkar moving on?

A: I love it. Some kids decide to stay home with their parents. Others move on. Parents have to support their children in what they decide to do. As Khalil Gibran said, "They're like the arrows and you're the bow." I can only give them a sense of direction. Beyond that I can't keep them back. All I want is they should go out and make me proud.

When Sanjay makes a good film I feel happy. Of course, I've the right to scream at him if he makes a bad film. At a recent awards function there were 17 people who went up to the stage and thanked me. But my job isn't to look at others. My job is to look ahead at what I can do.

Q: When are you directing another film?

A: Raju Hirani and Ram Madhvani are directing films that I'm producing. Ram was with me on "Mission Kashmir". He's making a huge fantasy like "Lord Of The Rings" for me. Amitabh will star in that. And if all goes well I'll direct another film this fall. I've a couple of ideas.